Medina Cantalejo responds to Ancelotti: “The referees are incorrect or proper, however they by no means invent”
meThe president of the Referees Technical Committee (CTA), Luis Medina Cantalejoaffirmed this Wednesday in relation to the statements of the Actual Madrid coach, Carlo Ancelotti, concerning the penalty that induced Girona’s draw on the Santiago Bernabu (1-1) that “The referees are incorrect or proper, however they by no means invent”.
In a go to to mellilla Alongside together with his deputy within the Presidency of the CTA, Antonio Rubinos Prez, Medina Cantalejo referred, to questions from the journalists, to the controversy that arose after Ancelotti complained concerning the arbitrationwhen stating relating to that penalty in favor of Girona that Marco Asensio “has not touched the ball together with his hand” and that each the VAR and the referee “have made it up”.
“We don’t make any type of statements relating to the performs, amongst different issues as a result of it has already handed the instruction of the Competitors Decide -after the opening of a process to research this case- in order that it decides with respect to the declarations of the coach Actual Madrid, who appears to me to be a really educated man”stated the chief of the arbitration group.
An excellent coach
Medina Cantalejo admitted that on this sense Ancelotti is a coach who “has by no means given any type of issues”, though, on the identical time, he made it clear that “A referee might or might not make a mistake, however what he doesn’t do is make issues up.”
Ancelotti has by no means given any type of issues
Relating to different sorts of actions or opinions, he indicated that he abstains “completely” as a result of he understands that it isn’t his “operate”, and added: “That is what the judges are for to find out what it’s and, as for what the occasion’s actions are, I do not enter both.”we merely have to stay to what our movies and our directions initially of the season have been which are being criticized a lot.
Reply to Asensio
He additional argued that the norm of arms has not modifiedin reference to the Actual Madrid participant Asensio He revealed on his social networks the motion during which his hand was whistled and highlighted that initially of the season they advised him to not point out it. “I merely ask that within the assembly we had with the media you go to that video and see what now we have considered one play and the opposite, and from there let each draw their conclusions and penalties,” Medina confused.
I am not speaking about Actual Madrid or Barcelona, or Betis or Albacete. The principles are what they’re and a few are of lots of interpretation
As well as, he made the next level: “I’m not speaking about Actual Madrid or Barcelona, or Betis or Albacete. The principles are what they’re and some are of lots of interpretation, and exactly for that we had the assembly with the groups”he asserted, during which he recalled that they confirmed movies “very clarifying about what a hand is.”
On this matter, in accordance with the president of the CTA, “What we stated initially is identical as what we are saying now, however when somebody says: ‘it is that in different video games…’ Inform me which one, but when that has occurred and the referee has made a mistake, then he has made a mistake,” he insisted. “The rule, interpretation and directions haven’t modifiedNicely, what was stated initially of the season is strictly the identical as what is claimed now,” he reiterated.
For Medina, the one method to finish this debate “It’s to know what a hand is, however, in fact, they’ll say that the primary ones who ought to understand it are the referees”an argument that he described as very recurrent, though he assured that “the referees solely understand it.”
Firstly of the season I commented that there are hand actions which are very grey, that squeak and which are troublesome to see due to the place of the arm
“Firstly of the season I commented that there are hand actions which are very grey, that squeak and which are troublesome to see due to the place of the armthat it’s neither open nor closed, nor fairly the other”, stated the president of the refereeing physique, who additionally regretted that, in his opinion, his explanations earlier than the beginning of the League had been manipulated.
I keep in mind then saying that “It isn’t a hand if the ball goes out, in the direction of the fifth amphitheater or the bandwith out there being a second risk of public sale”, an excessive that in some controversies has been transferred “to a different transfer that has nothing to do with it” with what he had commented earlier than the beginning of the season.
a sophisticated rule
Even so, Medina admitted that “it’s a difficult rule as a result of leaves a really giant share to the interpretation of the referee and, inside every part that was stated, is to attempt to sanction solely the arms which are very clear”, whereas he was happy with the low variety of sanctioned arms in comparison with final season.
For all those that converse and criticize, final 12 months solely fifteen or sixteen arms have been sanctioned, however this season we’re midway by
“For all those that converse and criticize, final 12 months solely fifteen or sixteen arms have been sanctioned, however this season we’re midway by. That doesn’t imply that the referees are profitable, removed from it, however the variety of arms has been lowered “the arbitration chief specified.
#Medina #Cantalejo #responds #Ancelotti #referees #incorrect #invent