The controversy: potential penalty from Eric and Dumfries, Pedri’s purpose disallowed, purple card forgiven to Çalhanoglu…

Barcelona was dominating on the Giuseppe Meazza when the controversy entered the scene within the twenty second minute, including one other chapter to the historical past of entanglements of video arbitration and the interpretation of the principles. Di Marco served to the far put up from the left flank, close to the highest of the world, when Christensen rejected the ball, which ended up hitting Eric García’s arm after a rebound.

“There’s a penalty from Eric. It isn’t offside. Subsequently, there’s a penalty. The one factor that may save him is that there was offside, however the penalty could be very clear…”, affirmed Iturralde González, former worldwide collegiate and arbitration analyst of AS, in Sports activities Carousel. Every thing indicated that Slavko Vicic, the referee appointed for the match, would sign the eleven meters, however he ended up going to the display to finish up signaling an offside previous to the infraction by the Barça central defender.

“It is an interference”

“It is a mismatch. THE VAR will not be of the identical nationality because the referee. The protocol is similar however it’s not used the identical in all nations. This determination has been taken out of his sleeve, I do not know why…”, Iturralde started by explaining, given the perplexity concerning the determination made by the Slovenian referee of the match. Nonetheless, later, as soon as the play was analyzed, he defined the rationale why he went to the monitor to overview the play.

“In case you take a look at the offside, the Inter participant by no means touches the ball as a result of it’s a clearance by the Barça participant. The Inter participant is behind the Barça participant. So sure, it’s interference as a result of it doesn’t come later to the Inter participant who was at stake.. It’s a cross to the far put up wherein Christensen cuts the ball, hits the Inter participant and results in a penalty. However since that participant could be very near Christensen on the punt, what it’s is interference. He’s nicely whistled ”he concluded.

Pedro’s purpose disallowed

After a shot by Dembélé repelled by the wooden as an appetizer, Pedri took benefit of a free ball within the small space to equalize within the 67th minute with an empty purpose after Dembélé’s lateral service. Nonetheless, Vicic made the gesture of the monitor once more to overview within the VAR a potential earlier hand by Ansu Fati that may find yourself invalidating the purpose: “Right here you can’t speak about rebound. Ansu has his hand up with the intention of touching the ball. Subsequently, the rebound that comes from the goalkeeper will not be price it. Solely he is aware of the intention, however It takes it very excessive from the start. clear hand”, Iturralde defined.

Roja forgiven Çalhanoglu

Barely ten minutes after Pedri’s disallowed purpose, Inter sighed once more with a referee’s determination. Hakan Çalhanoglu risked a low deal with on Sergio Busquets, whose ankle would find yourself hitting. “Clearly purple to Çalhanoglu, the VAR has to inform him”, Iturralde González defined. The Turk, performing as an improvised pivot within the face of Brozovic’s loss, solely noticed a yellow card, which prevented the VAR from getting into the scene, because the play was already judged.

Doable hand of Dumfries and fall of Lewandowski within the space

The ultimate melee of the azulgrana fight on the lookout for that tie that didn’t arrive added two different actions, virtually consecutive, to the glossary of the controversy. Within the firsta ball thrown to the far put up and directed on the head of Ansu Fati finally ends up being deflected by Dumfries’ forearmas could be seen within the picture.

“It is a penalty, he hits him together with his hand. Right here the warning can match as a result of Ansu Fati is simply going to complete off, ”Iturralde started by analyzing. Nonetheless, the sport continued whereas the VOR room gave the ‘examine’ sign. “For the VAR it’s not a hand. They are going to interpret that this hand will not be voluntary or hits him first with the pinnacle”, expressed Iturralde, with out discovering a technical clarification for the choice of the VAR, which ended up contemplating that there was no punishment within the motion of the Dutch winger.

Later, in one other nook kick, Lewandowski was displaced by Skriniar close to the small space when the Pole was about to move. Neither the referee nor the VAR thought of that the depth was ample to point penalty.